Second Amendment Summer: Florida’s Budget “keto” Cut — How DeSantis’ $115.6B Plan Uses Tax‑Holidays to Rewire Priorities
Metabolic context: think of a state budget like a body on a diet — governors trim, reallocate, and sometimes add a stimulant to shift where the body stores energy. Governor Ron DeSantis’ proposed $115.6 billion 2025–26 budget is exactly that: a fiscal “keto” move that pares some spending, amplifies public‑safety pay and targeted environmental investments, and adds a politically salient sales‑tax holiday on guns and ammo. This post explains the numbers, the legislative path, what polls and research say about public safety and gun access, and what to watch as Tallahassee digests the proposal. 🏛️📊
- DeSantis submitted a $115.6 billion budget for FY 2025–26 that includes a “Second Amendment Summer” sales‑tax holiday on firearms and ammo (estimated savings to shoppers: $8 million) and $118.3 million in pay increases for law enforcement and firefighters. [1]
- The plan proposes cutting 741 state positions and roughly $2.2 billion in business tax cuts achieved mainly by phasing out the commercial‑lease tax. [2]
- Floridians report majority support for stricter gun laws in several recent polls — a tension point with a high‑profile tax break for firearms. [3]
- Research on whether spikes in legal gun purchases lead to immediate increases in shootings is mixed; some studies find links (especially for impulsive purchases and domestic violence), others do not — the policy tradeoffs are nuanced. [4]
What’s in the budget — the hard numbers
- Total proposal: $115.6 billion for FY 2025–26 (governor’s submission). [5]
- Payroll and personnel: plan cuts 741 state jobs; proposes $118.3 million in pay increases for law enforcement and firefighters. Entry‑level officers would see a 20% boost; veteran officers and state firefighters would receive 25% increases (summary from governor’s office). [6]
- Tax changes: $2.2 billion in tax cuts driven largely by phasing out the commercial‑lease tax (2% → 1% on Jan. 1, 2026, then eliminated a year later). [7]
- Sales‑tax holidays revived: back‑to‑school & disaster supplies holidays, and a proposed “Second Amendment Summer” sales‑tax holiday for firearms, ammunition, and related items (Memorial Day → July 4). The governor’s office estimates the gun holiday would save shoppers about $8 million. [8]
- Education & environment: maintains Bright Futures at $632 million and raises per‑student K–12 funding $222 (to $9,205). Proposes $805 million for Everglades restoration projects. [9]
How the tax holiday works (legal mechanism and precedent)
Florida already has statutory authority and precedent for sales‑tax holidays codified under Chapter 212 of the Florida Statutes; back‑to‑school and disaster preparation tax exemptions are routinely enacted or renewed in statute. A new or expanded holiday for guns and ammunition would be implemented through legislation or specific appropriation language tied to the budget or a companion bill; it’s not just an administrative fiat. [10]
Historical and interstate comparisons
- Other states have experimented with 2A (Second Amendment) or hunting/fishing tax holidays — Mississippi and Louisiana have had versions of hunting/gun tax holidays in prior years. Florida’s move is part of a broader pattern of states using targeted holidays for political signaling and retail stimulus. [11]
- Revenue scale: the governor’s office projects roughly $8 million in foregone sales tax revenue from the gun holiday — large in political signaling but small relative to a $115.6 billion total budget. [12]
| Item | Governor's proposal (FY 2025–26) |
|---|---|
| Total budget | $115.6 billion. [13] |
| Estimated cost of gun tax holiday | $8 million in lost sales tax revenue. [14] |
| Law enforcement/firefighter pay pot | $118.3 million total; entry‑level +20%, veteran/firefighters +25% (proposal summary). [15] |
| State job cuts proposed | 741 positions. [16] |
| Everglades funding | $805 million proposed. [17] |
Politics and public opinion: who benefits, who’s uneasy
The sales‑tax holiday is a high‑visibility, low‑cost policy that appeals to conservative voters and pro‑gun constituencies while messaging “lower taxes, stronger police pay.” But public opinion in Florida is more complicated: recent state polls show majority support for stricter gun laws and strong backing for universal background checks and waiting periods — a contrast with a tax break specifically aimed at firearms purchasers. That split (policy vs. politics) creates room for political friction as lawmakers weigh whether to accept the governor’s package. [18]
“Nearly two‑thirds of Floridians (65%) said they think gun control laws should be made stricter,” per a Florida Atlantic University poll; other statewide and national surveys show similar majorities favoring background checks and other restrictions. [19]
Legislative timeline — what to expect
- Governor’s budget submission is the opening bid; in Florida the governor typically files the proposal ~30 days before the regular legislative session, which this cycle convenes in early March (WGCU notes March 4 in coverage). Lawmakers will negotiate through committee weeks and floor sessions; the fiscal year starts July 1. [20]
- Key votes: House and Senate budget committees; final conference committee and governor’s signature/veto window. Specific statutory tax exemptions (sales‑tax holidays) are usually implemented via session law or by inserting exemption language into the budget implementation or tax bill. [21]
- Business groups: generally supportive of the lease‑tax phaseout ($2.2B). [22]
- Gun‑rights voters & retailers: immediate beneficiaries of the holiday and increased purchasing incentives. [23]
- Gun‑safety advocates & many voters: skeptical that a tax break on firearms is consistent with public desire for stricter gun controls. [24]
- Legislative leaders: may trim or rework the package during session negotiations; prior sessions show divergence between governor and GOP legislative leaders on tax priorities. [25]
Evidence and tradeoffs: does easier purchase equal more violence?
There is no simple, settled answer. Scholarly work and policy research show mixed results:
- Some research links demand shocks (large, rapid increases in firearm purchases) to short‑term increases in firearm injuries and homicides — particularly when impulsive purchases rise or when new owners are inexperienced, which can affect domestic violence and suicide risks. [26]
- Other studies (and careful caveats from leading research centers) find no clear state‑level association between the 2020–21 sales spike and the year‑to‑year rise in homicides, pointing instead to broader social and economic drivers — unemployment, closures of community programs, and civil unrest. The Brennan Center and peer‑reviewed articles emphasize complexity and policy nuance. [27]
- Bottom line for policymakers: the fiscal cost of a short tax holiday ($8M estimated) is small, but the public‑health and safety consequences depend on the composition of purchasers, enforcement of background checks, and complementary violence‑prevention investments. [28]
States use sales‑tax holidays to stimulate retail, reward constituencies, or signal priorities (e.g., back‑to‑school, hurricane prep, energy credits). Gun‑oriented holidays are rarer but not unique; Mississippi and Louisiana have had related measures. The question in 2025–26 is whether Florida’s holiday will be a marketing device or create measurable shifts in ownership patterns. [29]
Practical examples and scenarios to watch
Scenario A — Legislature accepts the holiday intact
- Short term: retailers report increased Memorial Day–Fourth of July sales; estimated state sales tax revenue down ~$8M. [30]
- Medium term: potential bump in gun transfers and first‑time buyers; local debates re: background checks, safe‑storage outreach, and funding for violence‑prevention programs likely follow. Research suggests possible short‑run increases in certain categories of gun injuries; results are context dependent. [31]
Scenario B — Legislature trims holiday, keeps other priorities
- Lawmakers might narrow the list of tax‑exempt items (e.g., hunting gear only) or limit price caps — lowering foregone revenue and political optics while still delivering a pro‑shopper message. [32]
- Negotiators could reallocate some of the proposed $118.3M pay pot into targeted recruitment incentives rather than across‑the‑board raises, changing the fiscal math and bargaining dynamics. [33]
Polling, politics, and electoral math
Generic congressional polling and statewide opinion shape the political incentives: while DeSantis’ package emphasizes law enforcement pay and tax relief (messages that play strongly with Republican voters), multiple polls show Floridians broadly support steps to tighten gun access (universal background checks, waiting periods, limits on high‑capacity magazines). That split means the administration can deliver headline wins to its base while facing pushback from swing voters and safety advocates if violent‑crime metrics remain a top voter concern. [34]
What to watch next — timeline and red flags
- March legislative session calendar and committee hearings: budget committees, tax panels, and appropriations. (Governor’s budget was submitted; the session normally opens in early March.) [35]
- Companion bills: look for stand‑alone tax‑holiday language or insertion into the general tax bill — language will determine eligible items and caps. Check proposed statute text against Chapter 212 definitions. [36]
- Data monitoring: if a holiday passes, public‑health researchers and law‑enforcement analysts will track NICS checks, background‑check processing, and any short‑term shifts in “time to crime” for recovered firearms. Research groups that studied 2020–21 buying spikes will likely publish follow‑ups. [37]
- Red flags: sharp increases in first‑time buyers, evidence of reduced safe‑storage practices, or simultaneous loosening of background‑check or waiting‑period enforcement could elevate safety concerns. Conversely, coupling the holiday with funding for violence prevention could blunt risks. [38]
Estimated foregone revenue from the gun tax holiday: ~$8 million vs. total budget of $115.6 billion — a rounding error fiscally, but a big symbol politically. Proposed law‑enforcement pay pot: $118.3 million (roughly 15× the size of the gun holiday revenue impact). Those ratios help explain why the governor framed the package as prioritizing public safety while offering tax relief. [39]
Final verdict — a policy appetite test
DeSantis’ FY 2025–26 proposal is a strategic mix: signal to base (tax holiday + lease tax phaseout), invest in visible constituency (police/fire pay), and keep popular environmental/education spending lines intact (Everglades, Bright Futures). The fiscal cost of the gun holiday is small; its political significance is large. Policymakers will need to reconcile that symbolism with majority preferences for stricter gun rules in many Florida polls and the mixed but concerning public‑health evidence about purchase‑driven risks. The choice lawmakers make will tell us whether Florida’s budget cuisine is primarily appetite‑satisfying politics or a recipe for longer‑term public‑policy outcomes. [40]
- Track the budget bill number and committee schedule once session starts (watch House/Senate Appropriations calendars). [41]
- Watch for the tax‑exemption language: caps, item lists, and effective dates (those details determine real‑world impact). [42]
- Ask your state legislator whether they support coupling any gun tax holiday with safe‑storage outreach, expanded background‑check funding, or violence‑prevention grants — that’s where tradeoffs can be managed. [43]
Sources & evidence (selected)
- AP coverage reprinted at WGCU: “DeSantis proposes $115.6B state budget with guns, ammo sales‑tax holiday, higher police and fire pay” (Feb 3, 2025) — summarizes the governor’s proposal, job cuts, pay increases, tax changes, and projected $8M holiday savings. [44]
- Florida Statutes, Chapter 212 (2025): statutory framework for sales, use tax and existing tax‑holiday provisions (e.g., back‑to‑school exemptions). [45]
- Local coverage and reporting on the “Second Amendment Summer” proposal and associated list of exempt items (WGCU, Local10, and specialty outlets). [46]
- Florida public‑opinion polling (FAU poll and other state surveys) showing majority support for stricter gun laws and background checks. [47]
- Academic and policy research on gun‑purchase spikes and violence (mixed findings): MIT/Review of Economics & Statistics, UC Davis/Violence Prevention Research Program, Brennan Center, and Giffords analyses. [48]
- Book of the States / budget calendars: describes timing for governor budget submissions (governors typically submit 30 days before session). [49]
Summary — adherence tips, red flags, next steps
Adherence tips: monitor the exact statutory language that enacts any sales‑tax holiday; compare estimated foregone revenue with targeted public‑safety investments; and insist on data collection (NICS checks, time‑to‑crime, first‑time buyer metrics) if the holiday is enacted.
Red flags: a broad, uncapped exemption combined with rollback of background‑check enforcement or cuts to prevention programs; sudden surges of first‑time buyers without complementary safe‑storage or community programs.
Next steps: follow committee calendars in Tallahassee, read the budget implementation bill line‑by‑line when released, and watch for companion legislation that narrows or expands the holiday.
If you’d like, I can: (1) pull the exact draft statutory language (if and when the legislature files it) and annotate the items included/excluded; (2) build a one‑page side‑by‑side fiscal comparison of the governor’s plan and the House/Senate alternatives; or (3) track which counties and retailers post sales upticks if the holiday is enacted. Which would you like me to do next? 🗳️
Comments
0 commentsJoin the discussion below.